You are the chief of police advising officers on an arrest 

You are the chief of police advising officers on an arrest that has just been made on a double homicide. Your officers inform you that they have several eyewitnesses who claim they can identify the suspect.

You are the chief of police advising officers on an arrest

You are the chief of police advising officers on an arrest that has just been made on a double homicide. Your officers inform you that they have several eyewitnesses who claim they can identify the suspect. You want to make sure that the identification is as airtight as it can be. What identification procedure(s) do you advise your officers to use? Why? What makes your choice better than other options?

All initial posts should reference the textbook, Criminal Law & Procedure, and, at least one outside source. All sources must be cited using APA guidelines.

More details;

What are the possible causes of mistaken eyewitness identification?
The top 5 causes of eyewitness misidentification are:
  • Firstly, limitations in human memory,
  • Secondly, witness stress and anxiety,
  • Thirdly, suggestive or misleading police procedures,
  • Further, cross-race biases, and.
  • Additionally, the fact that witnesses tend to focus more on weapons than a perpetrator’s identity.

 

What is an identification procedure?
Identification Procedure – Any procedure that includes the suspect and tests the witness’s memory of a person involved with the crime, including a show-up, photomontage, lineup, mug-book search, and the production of a composite sketch.

How do you identify a suspect?

Three identification methods require the services of a forensic or investigative specialist: fingerprint comparison, DNA compari- son, and composite drawing. A more common identification method, the police lineup, involves investigators, witnesses or victims, and a known suspect.

How accurate are eyewitness accounts?

Eyewitness testimony is a potent form of evidence for convicting the accused, but it is subject to unconscious memory distortions and biases even among the most confident of witnesses. So memory can be remarkably accurate or remarkably inaccurate. Also, without objective evidence, the two are indistinguishable.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *