Discussion on the federal rules of evidence controversy area

This is a paper that is focusing on the Discussion on the federal rules of evidence controversy area. The paper also provides additional information to use in writing the assignment paper.

Discussion on the federal rules of evidence controversy area

Option #2: Controversial Rules of Evidence and Proposed Changes with Case Analysis For this assignment, you will submit a critical essay in which you: discuss controversial areas in evidence law; assess the specific Federal Rules of Evidence that are problematic within those controversial areas and then propose changes; and analyze the two cases you chose and analyzed in the Evidence Chart for your Module 7 Portfolio Milestone Assignment. NOTE: In Module 7, you will complete your evidence chart.

If you choose to complete Portfolio Project Option #2, you must also choose Portfolio Milestone Option #2 in Module 7. Visit the Module 7 folder for complete details on the Milestone assignment and to review its grading rubric. Directions: Some rules of evidence such as the Miranda warning are controversial, causing arguments over what would best serve the overall needs of society. Indeed, the introduction or preclusion of a single piece of evidence can result in a drastic change in the result of a case. In your paper, address the following.

Select four areas in evidence law where the rules are controversial. What are the controversial rules within each potentially problematic area? What language specifically makes the rule(s) controversial? How would you propose to improve this problematic area of evidence law? In your proposed suggestions for improvement, also include draft language for an improved rule. Research the history of the different areas you find troubling (for example: history of the use of expert witnesses in criminal court proceedings). Some areas you might consider: use of DNA evidence use of expert witnesses and the guidelines imposed for qualification as an expert child witnesses defendants’ rights at trial scientific evidence and reliability issues Miranda warnings privileges exclusionary rule and exceptions mistaken identification warrantless searches surveillance.

Discussion on the federal rules of evidence controversy area

Note: You are not confined to this list. You may choose other topics and their applicable rules in evidence to evaluate. This list is simply offered as a starting point and does not provide you with the rules you must analyze. Paper Instructions: Your paper should be 8-10 pages in length (not including the required title and references pages). Include discussion and citation of at least four credible sources other than (or in addition to) the course textbook. You can find these sources in the CSU-Global Library and in the special section there for Criminal Justice (Links to an external site.). Format your document and source citations according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *